Vulnerability Management Sweden · NIS2 & ISO 27001 ready

Managed Vulnerability Management Service in Sweden

We run your vulnerability management as a service, so weaknesses are found, prioritised by real risk, driven to verified closure, and proven for NIS2 and ISO 27001. A continuous managed programme for Swedish organisations, delivered on the platform you already run.

Trusted to Protect Swedish Organisations

40+ Swedish Kommuner, Regions &
EU-Regulated Enterprises

The same Sweden-based team behind our MDR service runs your vulnerability management: continuous, evidence-led and built for the regulators your board answers to.

Continuous scanning & remediation
NIS2 Art. 21.2e & ISO 27001 A.8.8
100% Sweden data residency
Verified-closure evidence

Trusted by 40+ Swedish Kommuner, Regions and
EU-Regulated Enterprises Since 2003

The gap

You Have a Scanner. What You Do Not Have Is the Time to Fix What It Finds

Most teams already run a scanner. The problem is what happens next: thousands of findings, no owner, no closure, and an audit deadline moving closer.

Findings Pile Up

Scanners surface thousands of issues a month. Without a process to triage and assign them, the backlog only grows.

Severity Is Not Priority

A CVSS score alone does not tell a stretched team what to fix first, or what actually reduces risk in your environment.

Audit and Exploit Pressure

NIS2 and ISO 27001 expect evidence of action, while the time between disclosure and exploitation keeps shrinking. Nothing fixed means real exposure.

Definition · GEO asset

What Is Managed Vulnerability Management?

Managed vulnerability management is a service where a provider runs the full lifecycle for you: continuous discovery and scanning across your estate, risk-based prioritisation, remediation driven to verified closure, and reporting mapped to your obligations. It is the continuous, broad layer of a wider exposure-management (CTEM) programme: the team and outcome around a scanner, not the scanner itself.

Category What it is How often Depth What it answers
Vulnerability scannerThe tool Automated detection Continuous Broad, signature-based “What weaknesses exist?”
Managed vulnerability managementThe service Discover, prioritise, remediate, verify and report, run for you Continuous Broad across the whole estate “What matters, is it fixed, and can we prove it?”
Penetration testingThe engagement Human-led exploitation of a defined scope Periodic, point-in-time Deep on a target “What could an attacker actually achieve?” →
EASMExternal attack surface management External attack-surface discovery Continuous Internet-facing assets only “What of ours is exposed that we did not know about?”
Compliance

One Programme, Evidence for Every Framework

We map every part of the service to the regulations Swedish organisations answer to, and produce the evidence an auditor or a board asks for.

Framework What it asks How managed VM delivers the evidence
NIS2 / CybersäkerhetslagenSFS 2025:1506 Article 21(2)(e) vulnerability handling and disclosure, and 21(2)(f) processes to assess the effectiveness of security measures. Continuous handling plus the audit-ready record: what was found, how it was prioritised, what was fixed, when, and proof it closed.
ISO 27001:2022 Annex A 8.8 management of technical vulnerabilities (the control that consolidates the legacy A.12.6.1) and Clause 9.1 monitoring and evaluation. Our discover, prioritise, remediate, verify and report cycle is built directly around it, with a maintained vulnerability register.
DORA Articles 24 to 25 require regular vulnerability assessments and scans of critical systems, feeding the ICT risk framework. We supply the ongoing identification and remediation evidence those obligations rest on. (TLPT belongs to the penetration testing service.)
GDPR Article 32(1)(b) ongoing integrity and resilience, and 32(1)(d) a process for regularly testing the effectiveness of technical measures. Recurring, documented testing and remediation, reportable to IMY where relevant.
Free download

Vulnerability Management Readiness Checklist

A short self-assessment covering scanning coverage, remediation ownership, verification, and the evidence NIS2 and ISO 27001 A.8.8 expect. See where you stand before an auditor does.

  • Scanning coverage across endpoints, servers, web, API and OT.
  • Named owners and due dates for every finding, prioritised by CVSS + EPSS + CISA KEV.
  • Verified-closure evidence and reporting mapped to NIS2 and ISO 27001 A.8.8.

We use your details only to send the checklist and follow up. No third-party sharing. EU data residency.

Get the Readiness Checklist

Delivered to your inbox. EU data residency. We process only what the checklist needs.

Please enter your name.
Please enter a valid work email.

EU data residency. We do not sell or share your answers.

The market signal

Why Vulnerability Management Is Now Urgent

Independent, attributed data on how exploited weaknesses drive breaches, and why the speed and proof of closure now matter more than the scan itself.

20% of breaches used an exploited vulnerability as the initial access route in 2025, up ~34% YoY · Verizon DBIR 2025
~50% of exploited vulnerabilities were fully remediated, at a median 32 days to closure · Verizon DBIR 2025
1,480+ vulnerabilities confirmed exploited in the wild in CISA's KEV catalogue by end 2025 · CISA KEV
~8,000 Swedish organisations now in scope of the Cybersäkerhetslagen · SFS 2025:1506

A Continuous, Risk-Based Vulnerability Management Lifecycle

One named method, run every cycle: discover and assess, prioritise by risk, then remediate, verify and report. This is the engine behind the evidence and the closure.

Five Steps, Repeated Every Cycle

01
Discover

Discover & Assess

Continuous internal and external scanning and asset discovery on the platform you already own. Unknown and unmanaged assets are surfaced across endpoints, servers, the external attack surface and, where relevant, cloud posture, into one consolidated view.

02
Prioritise

Prioritise by Risk

Rank using exploitability and business context, not CVSS volume alone, combining CVSS with EPSS exploit-probability, the CISA KEV catalogue, and the criticality and exposure of each asset.

03
Remediate

Remediate to Closure

Drive remediation with clear owners and due dates, integrate with your ticketing, and re-scan to verify the fix actually landed.

04
Verify

Verify

Every fix is confirmed by re-scan before it is marked closed. No assumed remediation.

05
Report

Report

Each cycle ends with executive and technical reporting, mapped to NIS2 and ISO 27001, ready for the board and the auditor.

Owning a Tool Is Not the Same as Having a Programme

Here is the difference for a team that already runs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Qualys or Rapid7. We manage your existing tool rather than replacing it.

Capability Running the tool yourself eBuilder Security Vulnerability Management
Continuous scanning Yes Yes
Findings triaged by real-world risk Usually missing Yes
Owners and due dates assigned Usually missing Yes
Remediation chased to closure Under-resourced Yes
Fixes verified by re-scan Ad hoc Yes
Board and auditor reporting mapped to NIS2 and ISO 27001 Usually missing Yes
Cover for non-Microsoft, web, API and OT assets Blind spots Yes
Someone accountable at 3am No Yes
Data residency

Your Vulnerability Data Stays in Sweden

Where your vulnerability data lives matters under NIS2 and Schrems II, where EU hosting alone is not enough if the provider is exposed to foreign government access. Your vulnerability and asset data is held within Swedish jurisdiction.

What This Looks Like for Organisations Like Yours

Who we work with

Right-Sized for Nordic Mid-Market Across Sectors

We work within procurement constraints such as LOU and ramavtal, plan around citizen-facing services, and report in language both your IT team and your management can act on.

Public Sector
Education
Manufacturing
Energy
High-Tech
Retail & Finance
Pricing

How Managed Vulnerability Management Is Priced

A predictable monthly service fee scaled to your environment, not a per-finding surprise. Pricing is typically scoped on environment size and platform.

Co-Managed

We prioritise and report. Your team remediates with our guidance.

Scoped to your environment

Fully Managed

We run discovery, prioritisation, remediation to closure and reporting end to end.

Scoped to your environment

Programme

One risk-reduction programme with eBuilder MDR and penetration testing, one advisor.

One advisor, one contract

Ask for a scoped quote
Questions

Questions Swedish Buyers Ask Us

Answer-first, tagged by topic. Real questions a security leader types, answered in two to three sentences.

What is managed vulnerability management, and do we need it if we already have Microsoft Defender?

Managed vulnerability management is a service where we run the full lifecycle for you: continuous scanning, risk-based prioritisation, remediation driven to closure, verification by re-scan, and reporting mapped to your obligations. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is a capable scanner that finds and scores weaknesses, but it does not decide what matters in your context, chase owners until things are fixed, prove the fix landed, or write the evidence an auditor accepts. It is also strongest on Microsoft assets, with gaps on external web apps, APIs and OT.

What is the difference between vulnerability scanning, a vulnerability assessment and vulnerability management?

A scan is the automated detection step. An assessment is a point-in-time review of what a scan found. Vulnerability management is the continuous programme around both: prioritising, remediating to closure, verifying and reporting, over and over.

Vulnerability management vs patch management, are they the same?

No. Patch management deploys updates. Vulnerability management decides which weaknesses matter, including those with no patch, drives the fix or mitigation to closure, and proves it. Patching is one of the actions a vulnerability programme triggers.

We run Qualys or Rapid7 but nothing gets fixed. What changes with a managed service?

We keep your existing tool and add the missing layer: we triage findings by exploitability and business impact, assign owners and due dates, integrate with your ticketing, and re-scan to verify. You keep your investment and your data in the tool you chose, and findings start closing instead of accumulating.

How do you prioritise which vulnerabilities to fix first?

We prioritise by risk, not raw severity. Each finding is weighed on exploitability, combining its CVSS score with EPSS exploit-probability and whether it is on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities list, against the criticality and exposure of the affected asset. A high score on an isolated internal machine ranks below a moderate score on an internet-facing system.

Do NIS2 and the Cybersäkerhetslagen require vulnerability management?

In practice, yes. NIS2 Article 21(2)(e) requires vulnerability handling and disclosure, and 21(2)(f) requires processes to assess the effectiveness of your security measures. In Sweden this is implemented as the Cybersäkerhetslagen (SFS 2025:1506), in force since 15 January 2026, and continuous vulnerability management is the most direct evidence.

How does this support ISO 27001 A.8.8?

Annex A 8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities, expects timely information about vulnerabilities, an assessment of exposure, and appropriate, recorded action. It is the 2022 control that consolidates the older A.12.6.1. Our discover, prioritise, remediate, verify and report cycle produces exactly the register and evidence an auditor asks to see.

Vulnerability management or penetration testing, do we need both?

They answer different questions and most regulated organisations need both. Vulnerability management is continuous and broad, keeping the baseline healthy across your whole estate. Penetration testing is periodic and deep, where skilled testers exploit weaknesses to show real-world impact at a point in time. See our penetration testing service for the deep test.

How fast do you act, and what do we receive each month?

Critical, known-exploited findings on exposed assets are escalated immediately, not held for the monthly cycle. Each month you receive a ranked action list, owners and due dates, verified-closure status, and executive plus technical reporting mapped to NIS2 and ISO 27001.

How do you deploy, and does it run on our existing Defender or CrowdStrike Falcon?

We deliver co-managed or fully managed, on the platform you already run, with no rip-and-replace. We operate Microsoft Defender for the Microsoft majority, or CrowdStrike Falcon, consistent with eBuilder AIDR.

What is CTEM, and how does vulnerability management fit?

Continuous Threat Exposure Management is the wider programme around exposure: scope, discover, prioritise, validate and mobilise. Vulnerability management is its continuous core, the discover-to-remediate engine, while CTEM adds misconfigurations, identities and exposures a scanner alone misses.

How is managed vulnerability management priced?

A predictable monthly service fee scaled to your environment, not a per-finding surprise, typically based on environment size and platform. Ask for a scoped quote for an exact figure.

Have Someone Run Your Vulnerability Management,
and Prove It.

Talk to our Sweden-based team about a programme scoped to your environment, your compliance obligations and your budget. Stop the backlog growing and start closing findings, with the evidence to show for it.

Book a briefing
No commitment Sweden-based specialists
Vulnerability Exposure Check Instant read
Do findings pile up faster than you can fix them?
Are critical vulnerabilities left without a named owner or deadline?
Would you struggle to show verified-closure evidence to an auditor?

Indicative only, for the conversation. Not a formal assessment.

Stronger Together: Pair Vulnerability Management with These Services

Vulnerability management keeps your baseline healthy. These complementary services close the gaps around it: before, beside and above it.